Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- politics:martial_law_and_starwars_and_false_flags [2024/12/05 10:55] – [Ukraine as a "Dumping Ground" for Old Munitions] wikiadmin
+++ politics:martial_law_and_starwars_and_false_flags [2024/12/05 11:03] (current) – [Conclusion] wikiadmin
@@ Line 202: / Line 202: @@
 The "Star Wars" franchise metaphorically reflects the role of financial systems in perpetuating conflict. Here's how:
 . **The Galactic Banking Clan:**
     * In Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones, the Banking Clan funds both the Galactic Republic and the Separatists, effectively profiting regardless of the outcome.
     * This mirrors how real-world financial institutions sometimes fund opposing sides in conflicts through loans, arms deals, or reconstruction funding.
 . **Profit from War:**
     * Wars generate immense profits for industries tied to finance, weapons, and reconstruction. Banks finance arms manufacturers, governments, and post-conflict rebuilding efforts, earning interest on loans and fees.
     * For example, during World War II, major financial institutions profited from lending to both Allied and Axis powers.
 . **Debt Dependency:**
     * Star Wars highlights how indebtedness can undermine sovereignty. Similarly, in real-life conflicts, countries burdened by wartime debt often lose financial autonomy, giving creditors long-term influence over their policies.
@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
 ==== Conclusion ====
-The Gulf of Tonkin incident, like 9/11, is an example of how a major event, initially presented as an act of aggression, can later be understood as manipulated or misrepresented for political gain. Decades later, historical evidence surfaced to show that the true nature of the Gulf of Tonkin event was far from what was originally presented to the public. This suggests that future revelations about 9/11, should they emerge, could follow a similar pattern—where the full truth of the event may not be fully understood until year
+The Gulf of Tonkin incident, like 9/11, is an example of how a major event, initially presented as an act of aggression, can later be understood as manipulated or misrepresented for political gain. Decades later, historical evidence surfaced to show that the true nature of the Gulf of Tonkin event was far from what was originally presented to the public. This suggests that future revelations about 9/11, should they emerge, could follow a similar pattern—where the full truth of the event may not be fully understood until years after or even decades later.